Duke,
Not that it's that important, but I ran across the anaglyph sphere I used as part of the composite. Even though the depth of the sphere is not very noticeable, it was indeed a 3D anaglyph as well.
Cheers,
Brian
My Flickr page: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ur4chun8/
My photos according to "Interestingness"...
http://fiveprime.org/hivemind/Tags/Brian,Wallace,3d
Capture Outdoors Maryland: http://www.capturemaryland.com/users/Starg82343
From: starg82343(-at-)hotmail.com
To: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Anaglyphs] Julia Fractal Composite/Duke
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:09:12 -0400
Thanks for the response Duke.
The original composite was done a few years ago and I can't remember if the inside sphere was done in 3D or 2D. It could easily be done in 3D with Chaoscope. I just can't remember if I took the shortcut or not by using a 2D sphere. After reading your question I went back to take a closer look and I personally can't tell one way or the other, so I think the illusion is acceptable for me.
I can tell you what I did do with this newer version is that I used Photoshop and drew a circle over the sphere and used the "Filter - Distort - "Spherize" option feature, which is normally used to distort a 2D object into a spherical object. Even though I distorted it to the maximum 100%, there wasn't much of a noticeable change from the original sphere.
Cheers,
Brian
My Flickr pa
ge: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ur4chun8/
My photos according to "Interestingness"...
http://fiveprime.org/hivemind/Tags/Brian,Wallace,3d
Capture Outdoors Maryland: http://www.capturemaryland.com/users/Starg82343
To: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com
From: stereospace(-at-)gmail.com
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:29:23 -0400
Subject: Re: [Anaglyphs] Julia Fractal Composite
A majorly cool creation... but I just have one question: is the sphere in 3D or is it a circle? I tend to see it more as a flat circle but I imagine it was intended to be a sphere.
Duke
(463K)