Hello Duke,
Good mirror self portrait (may be a small light spot on your
mirror eyes to see also you and Lumix reflexion on your eyes, but
easy to say not to doo ;-).
Did the Lumix is always available ? I would like to buy one like
the lenses space permit much more narrow subject than my two Fuji
W1.
I think a 3D public camera starting 3D must have narrow lenses
space, because generally the first shoot are portrait, friends
around a table or similar narrow subject.
During film camera a similar was the SUPER DUPLEX with 3 cm lenses
space (120 pro film giving two 24x24 mm L/R). With a close-up big
lenses on the two camera lenses very narrow subject was possible.
There is something I do not understand for factory building 3D
public camera, why do not built a 8 lenses camera with touching
lenses and a program to make
a selection of the best stereo base 1-2 or 1-3 or 1-8 depending of
the first plan subject and a similar camera will be ready for free
of glasses 3D-TV and monitor having 8 frames.
8 frames are also use generally by many lenticular printer, like
for the French magazine bellow PREMIERE speaking of movies.
Impressive lenticular result (shoot in cha-cha mode of the cover
with my Fuji).
GDGD
The Fuji W1 and W3 having only two lenses for Fuji lenticular
print was stupid (something like the virtual camera bellow
improved sale to public for better lenticular print). The depth of
Fuji lenticular print sample made with two lenses only was so poor
and lateral move so bad (two frames not enough for lenticular)
than I never send to Fuji lab in Japan any files L/R.
There is pro lenticular soft to calculate many intermediary frame
between two only in order to get 8 - 10 - 60 frames, but
apparently Fuji don't know. I send a letter to Fuji France (like
reseller) to advise Fuji Japan but I believe they never send to
Fuji Japan.
NIMSLO camera with four lenses for lenticular giving better
lenticular print and if use of a amateurish lenticular soft to
print yourself result was x3 time better than NIMSLO print.
Today the cost to produce a digital camera will permit much more
lenses and the Dr Lo (making with Mister Nim the NIMSLO) show on
the web some years ago a new digital camera and is new lenticular
digital lab for photographer shop (see picture down), he was
searching a sponsor to produce... but no news since. May be
because the Tsunami in Japan and the world crisis :-(
Can be done on the Lumix too.
New digital Dr Lo camera.. the pro model for wedding photographer
with add of two lenses will be great for public 3D camera (but
more smaller, flat like an I phone and with soft to made automatic
selection of the the twin best stereo base 1-2 ; 1-5 ; 1-8
(depending of distance) and for 3D TV free of glasses on our face
(but "glasses" lenticular decoder on TV, so to say "free of
glasses" is not right like there is glasses on TV) the soft keep
all the 8 frames. So each shoot will make a 8 frames like MPO for
lenticular 3D-TV and 8 single jpeg pictures.
Dr Lo with his 3 lenses amateurish
camera (not enough lenses in my opinion)
Much better is his pro camera, but add of two more lenses will
permit use for 3D-TV lenticular (generally 8 frames).
So I wait a similar 3D camera come on the market I use sometime
two Fuji Cameras (a Fufujiji) like bellow, this permit me to
choice the best stereo base or to built with Photoshop a picture
with two different stereo base (narrow lenses space for narrow
subject + wider lenses space for background). But such picture is
hard to built and need subject not too fast for hand sync.
I have to built a Z barre. Two LUMIX
will be much better.
Jean-marc
Le 19/01/2014 09:09, Duke a écrit :