Hi, I agree for the head, not for the background (up of the picture), like the positive parallax is too much for narrow eyes space. Need to be blurred or replace or eliminate.
I made a very quick correcting with Photoshop to remove some shadow and exaggerate positive parallax on background.
I prefer the pop-up of the first one. A 3 cm base is OK for +/- 40 cm distance, so your subject at +/-25 cm was too narrow, will need a stereobase of 1.5 cm or use of a close-up lens on the two lenses but don't put back the eagle head like on the first too the positive parallax is already too big and don't need to be exaggerate anymore.
With use of a convergent close-up lens on the two lenses of the camera, the background of course will be much more over maximum positive parallax for small eyes base and will need to be eliminate or replace.

Jm

Le 10/04/2014 00:43, Brian Wallace a écrit :

Much better stereo base on this one Shahrokh.

Thanks for posting once again!!!

Cheers,
Brian

My Flickr page: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ur4chun8/

My photos according to "Interestingness"... http://fiveprime.org/hivemind/Tags/Brian,Wallace,3d

My FAA Web page: http://brian-wallace.artistwebsites.com/ or brian-wallace.pixels.com

Capture Outdoors Maryland: http://www.capturemaryland.com/users/Starg82343

To: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com
From: dabiri58(-at-)yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:03:45 -0700
Subject: [Anaglyphs] Eagle version 2 for Imre & Wojtek [1 Attachment]

Let me show you this version that is from a bit further distance ( the bird turned its head).

On this shot the 3 Cm stereo base is almost correct or acceptable, i think.

What do you think?

Shahrokh.

__._,_.___

View attachments on the web

Reply via web post

Reply to sender

Reply to group

Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (3)

Attention new and "digest" subscribers: http://abdownload.free.fr/ is the Anaglyphs archive link that includes the photos as well.

Visit Your Group

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use