Thanks for the comments Imre, Flash, and Larry.
Imre,
I really didn't expect these cha chas to be perfect since there were so many trees moving between the cha cha. The most noticeable artifact is the shadows which are slightly out of sync because of the tree movement. This of course causes a form of R/R. I even cloned a small portion of the bottom right on this image because it was closest, largest, and most noticeable. On top of that, there is some distortion caused by the wide angle lens used which is always difficult and sometimes impossible to align completely. I also used my zoom lens but backed down to the minimum 85mm. I expect this to also cause some form of disparity or possibly slight card-boarding. I thought I got this one fairly close with some manual alignment tweaks but apparently the combination of these problems IMO is what has you perple
xed. Understand that I don't expect these to be perfect under the conditions mentioned but some may be better than others depending on the camera and lens used along with the focal length.
The cameras and lenses were mentioned in the first post of the series. I expect that If I post some images made by the W1 there will be good sync, but less depth and less pixel quality. Since I'm not only creating 3D images these days but 2D for print quality and possible sales, I'm usually choosing the better quality camera and lenses for capturing which will also create larger prints for my Fine Art America website.
Cheers,
Brian
My Flickr page: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ur4chun8/
My photos according to "Interestingness"...
http://fiveprime.org/hivemind/Tags/Brian,Wallace,3d
Capture Maryland: http://www.capturemaryland.com/users/Starg82343
To: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com
From: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:20:30 +0200
Subject: Re: [Anaglyphs] Fort Armistead #4
Hi!
This one not convinced me....something is wrong...but I dont know what....
Imre
