Previous 120737 Next
(In reply to)
Messages on Anaglyphs group
Post on Anaglyphs group
Viewed [?00?] time(s)


Subject : Re: [Anaglyphs] Tree Fungi - (2 versions,same image)
From : "Duke stereospace(-at-)gmail.com [anaglyphs]"
To : anaglyphs Yahoo
Date : Thu, 30 Oct 2014 23:58:52 -0400


 

Yes, depth is better in A, and I like it closer to the window in the first shot.

Duke

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Brian Wallace Starg82343(-at-)hotmail.com [anaglyphs] <anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 

This Tree fungi was just a small portion that was growing on this tree at Lake Waterford Park in Pasadena, MD.

For those who may like to compare which version they find more appealing, I did the original capture with a shallow DOF.  I went ahead and processed it without extracting the background.  Then I did the second version with the extracted background and a gradient background replacement.  I also went over the edges of the changed portion with the SPM clone tool to fix any mis-sync'd dependencies from the replaced background.  I also added a 3D border to act as a FW for reducing deviation although I don't think the harshest ghosting would have been objectionable.

The X version is a little flat.  I took other shots which I'm sure include a stereo pair that will have sufficient depth for X.
The same stereo base was about right for the Anaglyph.

Cha cha, Nikon D600, PS-CS6, ACR, SPM, IrfanView.

Cheers,
Brian

My photos according to "Interestingness"... http://fiveprime.org/hivemind/Tags/Brian,Wallace,3d




--
3D info:  SPM, Photoshop.
 

__._,_.___

Posted by: Duke <stereospace(-at-)gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (10)

Check out the automatic photo album with 2 photo(s) from this topic.
Brian_Tree Fungi 1 SM_102714_A.jpg Brian_Tree Fungi 1a SM_102714_A.jpg

Attention new and "digest" subscribers: http://abdownload.free.fr/ is the Anaglyphs archive link that includes the photos as well.

.

__,_._,___