Dariush,When you change an image originated by someone else, please add modified or your initials to the title so everyone will know which is the one you changed.Its real hard for me to see what you changed. The most obvious difference is that the moss is tilted back a little and a small amount of the image has been deleted at the bottom, and the image stretched. The lizard head looks to me just as high above the moss in either view. I would think that the perspective and hyperness of a phantogram is determined by how far away you look at the print and the angle you look. The image looks a little softer as well. What exactly do you feel makes this modified version look more natural? [;<)David W. AllenFrom: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com [mailto:anaglyphs(-at-) yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Dariush Radpour
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 6:30 AM
To: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Anaglyphs] David/Last few phantogramsSorry David but this version looks un-natural to me!! It's exagerated as an hyper 3D and backgroud looks wrong as a perspective! I don't think that any pop-up anagyph is acceptable just because contains a pop-up element! I did an alternative version that looks more natural and accebtable as a perspective at least for my eyes and taste...I don't know if you are agree..Cheers,Dariush