Previous 41621 Next
Messages on Anaglyphs group
Post on Anaglyphs group
Viewed [?00?] time(s)


Subject : Re: [Anaglyphs] Mushrooms nearly breaking the infinity rule
From : "Dr. Zsolnai-Nagy Imre"
To :
Date : Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:47:11 +0100

41621_Figura_03.jpg : (145K)

Hello John!
I think the maximum eye separation is on every type of monitor is 64-65 mm.
But if we see an anaglyph in original size. On the monitor, the analglyphs
are less, so the max separation must be less....
But if you want do a life-size separation on a monitor, you can do it, but
the concept is what you see on my attachment.
The nearest object separation is 65 mm, the farest point separation is
BIGGER. ( 1+1 degrees).
For the view of farest object, you dont need to diverg your eyes, enough to
see parallel because the fusion is working....But the eyes DONT like this
very much...:-)))
So the deviation and the separation isnt the same!!!!
Cheers: Imre

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Wattie" <nzstereoscope(-at-)yahoo.co.uk>
To: "anaglyph group" <anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:43 PM
Subject: [Anaglyphs] Mushrooms nearly breaking the infinity rule

> The "infinity" separation is 64mm on my 17 inch
> computer monitor and that is about as much as humans
> can fuse without diverging their eyes. On a bigger
> screen the separation may be more (depending on the
> pixel setting). Excess separation can always be
> handled by moving away from the computer monitor but
> that is a pain and most people cannot be bothered.
>
> Normally for forest macro work I set the background at
> no more than twice the distance to the subject, to
> avoid the wide infinity separation effect, but on this
> day I wanted to be a pest. The background usually is
> too far away, so I often change it to something like a
> log of wood, artfully moved into place for the job. I
> actually like deep stereo, but when the distance goes
> out of focus (as here) it becomes a bit pointless.
>
> I hate rules, but the infinity separation rule is a
> "must do". 64mm is the limit for anaglyphs, but for
> parallel pairs separation must be much less (which is
> where the 1.2mm MAOFD on 35mm format comes in).
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try
> it
> now.
> http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/
>
> Attention new and "digest" subscribers: http://abdownload.free.fr/ is the
> Anaglyphs archive link that includes the photos as well.
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

__._,_.___
Attention new and "digest" subscribers: http://abdownload.free.fr/ is the Anaglyphs archive link that includes the photos as well.
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Y! Entertainment

World of Star Wars

Rediscover the force.

Explore now.

Search Ads

Get new customers.

List your web site

in Yahoo! Search.

Best of Y! Groups

Check out the best

of what Yahoo!

Groups has to offer.

.

__,_._,___