(In reply to)
Messages on Anaglyphs group
Post on Anaglyphs group
Viewed
(162K)Hi Matthew an Mike
thanks for your precise words.
For my modest opinion the saturation and the umbalanced vision are not in
rapport.
During many years I make test on the anaglyph glasses and I do many real
test on the people.
For about two years I try to create a good anaglyph glass, I try the direct
printed method, plastic, pvc, glass, quartz, chemicals geleatine, etc.
Before I have a company named "TecnoDi" that have collaborations with
glasses productors in China, Taiwan, and Italy.
The result of this work is that, is impossible to create a perfect anaglyph
glasses.
To make a test of anaglyph glasses I create a series of visual reference:
In this page you have example and coloured tables.
With the red table you can easy verify the response of the saturation, this
table have many different saturations.
http://alfa.
To make a test to verify if the glasses are balanced see the special image
attached .
If you look this image without glasses, the image apparently move.
If you look with the anaglyph glass the image stop.
If you look for about 20 seconds (using the glasses) and the image is
completely stopped your glasses are balanced.
I discovery also this, many people that use the eyeglasses (no achromatic)
looking the anagliph see as fondamental a red colurs.
The red colours is more intense in function of the saturation.
The same people see flashing and false depth for the small graphics objects.
Sorry for my Oxford english
Ciao and thank again
Guglielmo
Hello, Guglielmo,
Dariush is right; the Red channel is too saturated. You are also right;
with standard Red/Cyan glasses, it is not possible to perceive a true,
balanced Red. However, the extreme saturation of the Red channel causes a
superdominant luminosity factor in the Red lens, causing the overall view to
appear brighter to the Left Eye than it does in the Right Eye. Thus, the
overall image perception is unbalanced.
On the plus side, the deghosting is nicely done.
Cheers,
Matthew
--- On Thu, 12/18/08, Guglielmo Menegatti <kems(-at-)magia.it> wrote:
From: Guglielmo Menegatti <kems(-at-)magia.it>
Subject: Re: [Anaglyphs] Gug NOOO!/Fori Imperiali, Roma
To: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogrou
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 12:08 PM
?
Hi Dariush
many,many thanks.
Excuse me, you can specify if you are referring to the vision with or
without glasses.
What you wrote is beyond my comprehension.
With the normal anaglyph glasses it is impossible to see the colours red and
orange, and in these statement I am no doubts.
If with your glasses you see the red as red, your glasses are certainly
special and uncommon.
Ciao
Guglielmo
NOOOOOO my Dear friend!!!!! Your version is not in color but only red and
orange!!! My version is what my eyes were seeing there, gray sky, gray and
white stones and some green grass on the ground.I am sorry Gug.
Ciao,
Dariush
--- Gio 18/12/08, Guglielmo Menegatti <kems(-at-)magia.it> ha scritto:
Da: Guglielmo Menegatti <kems(-at-)magia.it>
Oggetto: Re: [Anaglyphs] Fori Imperiali, Roma
A: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogrou ps.com
Data: Giovedì 18 dicembre 2008, 20:09
?
Hi Dariush
I try to make a colours reconstruction.
I used 3D Gugle PRO 8.2, first "Reconstruction by contrast" and then
"Deghost by conrtast"
Please, for me your opinion are of extreme importance.
Ciao
Guglielmo
Hello,
there are maybe milions of pictures taken from this angle that shows a
portion of Imperia Forum of Rome but surley very few in 3D! here is the last
one taken four days ago!
Cheers,
Dariush
Cha cha hyper stereo shot taken with Panasonic LUMIX, 35cm of stereo base.
