Mainer.. MY file size was 577 KB ....You say it was too large --I don't understand. I think your anaglyph is better   than mine. Your image definately looks  sharper. You said you pushed it back. I thought my image was behind the window, here again I don't understand. I  really would like to understand .What was your reasoning for pushing it back. I appreciate the trouble you went through to show me this and in showing me the improved image indicates to me that I still have a lot to learn . Mainer I will send more images using the same setting as before would you be so helpful  and indicate again their faults. Thank you very much for taking the time. Fred

---

From: Mainer <jamcojam(-at-)yahoo.com>
To: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 6:26:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Anaglyphs] group advice used-Fred

Real nice subjects. Too large. I resized sharpened and pushed this one back two clicks. Don't really know if I improved it much. Sometimes hard without the originals.   Mainer --- On Sun, 3/22/09, fred orvieto <fredorvieto(-at-) yahoo.com> wrote: From: fred orvieto <fredorvieto(-at-) yahoo.com> Subject: [Anaglyphs] group advice used To: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogrou ps.com Date: Sunday, March 22, 2009, 3:40 PM My grand children's playhouse was built with leftover logs that I used to build my home..It's free standing on telephone poles sunk 3 ft in the ground and is nestled between hemlocks. The entire playhouse with the exception of the roof was cut in my workshop and assembled on sight. I designed it using the Delta Cad program. I had no help except what the good lord gave all of us: the power to be creative and inventive when we halve to be. It was a great experience. Please give further constructive criticism and I will build on what I already have. Fred

<DSC_7713.jpg><DSC_7787z.jpg>