Marshall,

I was under the impression that your opinion was that anaglyphs must always be in focus, from front to back, since "that is how we see in real life". I don't see how you can criticize another member's anaglyph for lack of overall focus then give yourself the option to break the rule you have established. Don't get me wrong, I like the anaglyph; I just don't get the double standard.

Flash

--- On Fri, 5/29/09, Marshall Rubin <mrubin(-at-)hvc.rr.com> wrote:

From: Marshall Rubin <mrubin(-at-)hvc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [Anaglyphs] Azaleas Up-Close - Marshall
To: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, May 29, 2009, 10:51 AM

Flash--

I expected comments about the shallow DOF and the fact that I often cite sharpness throughout as of vital importance. There is one caveat in my favor,

however. When citing the rule I almost always indicate that sharpness throughout is USUALLY essential. It's up to the members to decide

for themselves if this view benefits or not from its softer background.

But I'm glad you've been paying attention. :-)

Marshall

__._,_.___

Messages in this topic (3) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

Messages | Files | Photos | Links

Attention new and "digest" subscribers: http://abdownload.free.fr/ is the Anaglyphs archive link that includes the photos as well.

Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe