Hi Imre,
for "trained" people my example gives not any problem
because our brain is doing the rest, generating in our mind the complete
vision from left to right. It´s quite bad loosing the foreground in any
3-D!
Another example with same base:
http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/26616785.jpg
regards Paul
Von:
anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com [mailto:anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com] Im Auftrag von Imre
dr.Zsolnai-Nagy
Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009 23:26
An: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com
Betreff: Re: [Anaglyphs] Today's shot.....
Hi Paul!
I think your image is better in this way...see the attachment...
To put everything behind the window isnt a good job if the deviation is big. On
both side are visible the problem of fusion ( in your version)
Imre
2009/12/4 Paul Weissbach <ph-weissbach(-at-)t-online.de>
Hi
Imri and all members,
long
long time ago, but still today Iam activ with 3-D Anas.
As
I know the Fuji W1 have a fix base that means, a little bid more distance could
be a better solution for your tiger.
Anyway
I like your Ana. The deviation is quite big but mounted bihinde
the Stereowindow the Ana looks good for me (see my example).
By
using bigger deviations only the Anaglyphs gives us the possibility to
show the world nearly real. Look my example with 35cm base: http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/28599555.jpg
The
the most important thing for Anas: allways mount it behinde the
stereowindow.
Many
greetings from Germany to all members!
Paul
Von: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com
[mailto:anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com]
Im Auftrag von Imre dr.Zsolnai-Nagy
Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009 17:30
An: anaglyphs
Betreff: [Anaglyphs] Today's shot.....
....in a museum.
and cross version.
Imre
ps: Fuji W1
--
http://www.conversion3d.freeweb.hu
http://imre3d.axo.hu