Hi Imre,

sorry,  but I can not understand your opinion about, how have to be a good 3-D. Look my example attached , I think that the  base used  could not be better. It looks perfect for me.  This is the reason why we make 3-D`s .

Your cropped version  in my opinion is a  bad example for  people which like to enjoy the third dimension.

regards Paul

 

 

 

Von: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com [mailto:anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com] Im Auftrag von Imre dr.Zsolnai-Nagy
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2009 21:24
An: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com
Betreff: Re: [Anaglyphs] OPHM 25 from Imre

 

 

Hi Brian!
I wonder why you have so positive replies for this image.( from some experts too, by my consideration....no names....of course :-)  )
For my opinion it is a bad stereo image, too rivalries on the edges and too much deviation for the far point.
My preferable  "rules" are visible on the attached images.
1: show the correct stereo window, of course a lot of window violation....
2: the cropped version is my acceptable version for your base and focal....

What do you think?

Imre