Frans   I don't recall your posts too ghosty. In this ana, before adjusting the scene forward (with the FW to avoid a WV) I had what I considered unacceptable ghosts on the jacket. I will send you the example when I get home from work shortly. I am confident I am not seeing more ghosts than others, since I have viewed posts on numerous monitors and seen little difference.   I agree with your comments about experimentation. That is essentially what my use of the FW is. As you know, even with that simple process in SPM, there are many different ways to adjust a FW.   Mainer --- On Mon, 1/25/10, fransvandepoel <fransvandepoel(-at-)yahoo.de> wrote: From: fransvandepoel <fransvandepoel(-at-)yahoo.de> Subject: [Anaglyphs] Re: Trail Blazing (CAUTION: FLOATING WINDOW)-Mainer To: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, January 25, 2010, 11:56 AM   > Ghosts on the jacket were unacceptable without a FW. That's frightening because on my screen there is no ghosting, even without FW. This means that when I post my own ghostless images they probably look dreadful on your screen. Is that so ?   My little contribution to the FW soap (or soup): I like to see this forum as an experimentation place where new techniques like Shahrokhs flexi-frame for example are presented and commented. I am willing to forget violations of all sorts (parallax, window, colorbalance ...) IF I learn something new (for example how to control the maximum on-screen deviation in PSM). As far as contents is concerned: on Flickr ( http://www.flickr. com/search/ ?q=anaglyph ) there are still 48000+ anaglyphs waiting :-)

• New Members 7