Messages on Anaglyphs group
Post on Anaglyphs group
Viewed
(698K)Hi Flash,
>
> The main temple at Chichen Itza was much higher and probably equally steep. Last year three people feel to their deaths at Chichen Itza and so now no one is allowed to ascend the temple, from what I've been told. I was there two years before and went up. I am naturally afraid of heights, but there were rope 'banisters' along the way. Going up wan't too bad, but coming down was where the problem was.
>
> Do you have any anaglyphs from Chichen Itza? Many years ago, friends visited Chichen Itza. Their kids were young and had a hard time with the name. They just called it Chicken Pizza.
>
> Best regards,
> Bill Silverman
>
>
>
Spectacular looking place. Nice anaglyph. I remember Kukulkan at Chichen Itza being steep, but this looks much steeper!
>
> Flash
>
> --- On Mon, 1/3/11, pierre.meindre(-at-)free.fr <pierre.meindre(-at-)free.fr> wrote:
>
> From: pierre.meindre(-at-)free.fr <pierre.meindre(-at-)free.fr>
> Subject: Re: [Anaglyphs] A Mayan God: last of the Oxkintok series --> Uxmal
> To: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com
> Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 2:11 PM>
>
>> Nice pictures Bill.
>
> > Oxkintok was an interesting place to visit but the jewel of the area is Uxmal.
> Good! In 2008 I visited Uxmal but skipped Oxkintok.
>
> Pierre Meindre.
>
> ----- "William Silverman" <wmagman(-at-)gmail.com> a écrit :
> >>"A Mayan God"
> >
> > There were very few ornamental sculptures or carvings at Oxkintok. I don't know where this one came from originally. It was photographed in on of the three museum rooms of the museum complex at the eco-tourism site of Mun-Ha (www.munha.org)
> >
> > Oxkintok was an interesting place to visit but the jewel of the area is Uxmal. Uxmal is huge and there is a very nice light show at night.
> > Next time I visit my daughter and her family I hope to bring my Fuji W3 to Uxmal.
> >
> > I hope you enjoyed the visit.
> >
> > Bill Silverman
>>
