Hi!
No, I'm no allergic, believe me...:-))
I think this:
If ONLY ONE person is interested in this forum about the technical side, I'm glad. ( You arent this one, it is clear from years..)
I understand the RULE...I never cut other's job in the future...
( For me was easer to crop, than writing suggestions...)
With my works everybody can do anything...and can send the modification...I'm glad to see it, because I can know better the other's vision.
The attachment now, of course isnt an artistic job, but an orthostereo image....
Imre
AHHHH::: You are NOT authorized to crop somebody els's image Imre... do you understand that?!! You can only suggest the primary technical deficiency or mistakes but you can't CUT somebodies image by your decision and insist on that as a correct act! Your vision is purely technical on this matter and I repeat, it's only %50 of the whole thing...so you must learn to understand the rest of the matter that we call it The creative and personal choices of the author that should be respected. It's amazing that you refuse to accept this fundamental aspect of whole issue!!Please ask the author the permission if you can intervene on the composiotion of the image first or if the author can take another image from the same subject as you suggest, first but don't "ruin".. that personal vision of the author's image only in the name of technical lacks or problems! Photography is accepted as an ARTISTIC form and expression too ( not all the photos of course...) and this site is not a scienific laboratory only... :-) I know that you are a bit "alergic"... to what I am saying but it's true Imre.ciaoDariush
--- Sab 7/5/11, Imre dr.Zsolnai-Nagy <imrezsolnainagy(-at-)gmail.com> ha scritto:
Da: Imre dr.Zsolnai-Nagy <imrezsolnainagy(-at-)gmail.com>
Oggetto: Re: [Anaglyphs] Chantilly Castle - Imre
A: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com
Data: Sabato 7 maggio 2011, 20:46Hi Wojtek!Yes, it is a correct crop. For this image size the deviation is less, better visible...Imre2011/5/7 Wojtek Rychlik <wr(-at-)pikespeakphoto.com>
Imre,
I think the original was better composed. I didn't like the watter because it wasn't in sync, but your version has drastically more empty sky. I'd prefer more like a panorama with some water and little sky removed, something like this:
------------------------------------
Attention new and "digest" subscribers: http://abdownload.free.fr/ is the Anaglyphs archive link that includes the photos as well.Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/anaglyphs/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/anaglyphs/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
anaglyphs-digest(-at-)yahoogroups.com
anaglyphs-fullfeatured(-at-)yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
anaglyphs-unsubscribe(-at-)yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Cheers,
Wojtek
On May 6, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Imre dr.Zsolnai-Nagy wrote:
> Hi Pierre!
> I'm in the stereoscopy from more than 12 years....so I'm an old boy...:-)))
> After this long time I belive what I dont believed before....: Less is more....
> The fusion capacity is only one side of the stereoscopy, the other side is the eye-brain-perception axe, what tell to us: what is real and what is irreal...I'm sure you understand me...:-)
> I can fuse well your excellent hyper 3D of course, and I admire it!!! But I think, less is more....
> See my crop...
> Cheers: Imre
--
http://www.conversion3d.freeweb.hu
http://imre3d.axo.hu