Previous 94391 Next
(In reply to)
Messages on Anaglyphs group
Post on Anaglyphs group
Viewed [?00?] time(s)

Subject : Re: [Anaglyphs] gravestone Imre
From : john mcaskill
To : anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com
Date : Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
94391_grave_l.JPG : (394K)
 

Thanks Imre.  I don't understand this parallax stuff. When I decide to take a picture I try to guess the near point and shoot.I keep it simple.This picture was cropped from a larger view. Attached is left image.
      John Mac
From: Imre dr.Zsolnai-Nagy <imrezsolnainagy(-at-)gmail.com>
To: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, June 10, 2011 4:03:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Anaglyphs] gravestone

 

Hi John!
I sincerely pray to decide what is better?!
My intention is to demonstrate that the total parallax must be divided to positive and negative parallax in 50-50% ratio...
Your setup is correct...only the mounting  issue is what I discuss...:-)))
My image is bigger than your and ir is works for me in less size too...
Cheers: Imre

2011/6/9 john mcaskill <jonmcaskill(-at-)yahoo.com>


    I often take a shortcut through this cemetery.Not in a hurry going slow off my normal route I spotted this gravestone.Nothing special except for the dates on it.
    John Mac





--
http://www.conversion3d.freeweb.hu
http://imre3d.axo.hu

__._,_.___
Attention new and "digest" subscribers: http://abdownload.free.fr/ is the Anaglyphs archive link that includes the photos as well.
.

__,_._,___