From: "Wojtek Rychlik wr(-at-)pikespeakphoto.com [anaglyphs]" <anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com>
To: anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Anaglyphs] Wojtek / Garden Critters
I?m curious what the standard approach could be. Is the sync so bad? If you?re exposing light sensitive sensor for too long it may degrade its properties.Cheers,WOn May 9, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Greg Hjellen greghj(-at-)yahoo.com [anaglyphs] <anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com> wrote:I figure the degree of shutter sync I can achieve might be affected by camera-to-camera variability in mirror lock-up time. The Canon SL1 lets one lock up the mirror, then independently operate the shutter at some later time. I haven't yet proved the theory to myself. In these particular photos the squirrel sat still.Greg
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (16) |