(In reply to)
Messages on Anaglyphs group
Post on Anaglyphs group
Viewed
Dear Shahrokh
You are so kind and diplomatic in your statements, that is why I love You.
Best regards
Claus
Shahrokh Dabiri skrev:Hi dear Claus,
I understand what you say and I'm so sorry you are offended but i'm
also so surprised that why we still should see problem with this CC
case, let me explain more;
If you remember we agreed that we shouldn't separate or spread our
group members because some like or prefer to post CC anaglyphs too,
we agreed that by puting a "Colorcode" signal like "CC" in the
subject line text; those who doen't like to see this CC format
easily can ignore or use their "Delete" button!
Although I personally prefer Red/Cyan Anaglyphs but I never may
sting the CC fans or their works, I strongly ask others to do the
same,
dear friends we are not here to offend/bother/ insult eachother, let
continue our deep friendship, even one offended person in this group
is too much for a great group of understanding people like you!
thus again i ask from CC fans to put a "CC" signal in thier further
subject line text and also ask from opposition to use their "Delete'
button or ignore in case!
Civilized understanding people only spread love, peace and happiness!
(from Shahrokh Dabiri ;-)
Cheers,
Shahrokh ;)
--- In anaglyphs.yahoogroups.com, Claus Krarup <ck....> wrote:
>
> Dear Dariush
>
> Some men like the mother and some men like the doughter - and You
like
> Red/Cyan for one or more reasons. It is not a problem. The problem
is
> when one are giving misinformations about the mother or the
doughter or
> Red/Cyan or ColorCode or anything else in the world. It is not
fair and
> it is far from my moral to do that.
>
> As You can read i my mail at
> http://abdownload.free.fr/Anaglyphs/13/13715_Body.html I try to be
> objective when I compare the different ways of viewing 3-D. I just
want
> the misinformators to stop misinformations whatever they are
> misinformating about ColorCode, danish cartoon painters, black
people,
> lesbians, judes, muslims and a lot more.
>
> You ask me what I find better in ColorCode compared with Red/Cyan:
THE
> COLORS, THE COLORS AND THE COLORS. For me it is very important
that the
> colors are close to the real world. In ColorCode they are much
closer
> than in R/C, much more closer.
>
> I can not describe it better. I will just ask You to read my Mail
once
> again and then go behind the text and think of what I realy mean.
>
> I am sorry if I am using words that can sound hard to You, but I
don't
> know exact the value of agitated and a lot of other words.
>
> With all respect
>
> Claus
>
> Dariush Radpour skrev:
>
> > Dear Claus,
> > I understand that you are disapointed and maybe sad because some
of us
> > didn't have a positive reaction regarding the Color code
Anaglyph
> > system but to be agitated seems to be exagerated for an issue
like
> > this!Tell me why you are so sensitive to this issue? Are you a
founder
> > of Color code system?What you found in that system better in
> > comparison to a traditional Red-Cyan system?
> > I am against any type of fondamentalysm in general and I am free
to
> > chose a system(political or anaglyphical :--)))) in which I feel
> > better and have a better consideration and if some other system
> > bothers my sight or dosn't give me enogh satisfaction as I
aspect,well
> > I feel free to be critical to that issue or system.To be very
frank
> > with you I think some of us are so sensitive to a tecnical
aspect of
> > 3D image making, than the essence of what the images
> > represents(the real difficult part of the matter..) so I don't
see any
> > real pro blem here.Please let me be free to stay critical to
what I
> > don't like.
> > cheers,
> >
> > Dariush
> >
> > */Claus Krarup <ck....>/* ha scritto:
> >
> >
> > *Dear members of the group please read this and try to
understand
> > what I mean even though my english is bad.*
> >
> >
> > I am disappointed and agitated because some members of this
group
> > apparently are crusaders against ColorCode. They have
problems with
> > viewing ColorCode images, and that is OK. But it is not OK to
> > insinuate,
> > that ColorCode is a bad prouct, and it is not OK to talk bad
about
> > it,
> > just because one have problems with viewing it.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
> >
> > Let us take a look at the world outside the group:
> >
> > My daughter can't hear stereomusic because she is born with
a da
> > mage on
> > the ears. She never says that stereomusic is bad. She don't
talk
> > about
> > it because she don't have the possibilities to evaluate it.
> >
> > My brother-in-law can only see with his right eye. He is not
> > talking bad
> > about 3-D. But he is sorry about it and wish he was able to
see 3-D,
> > like my doughter is sorry about she can't listen to
stereomusic.
> >
> > I think most people will be agitated at theese two people if
they say
> > stereomusic and stereoimages are bad. Woud'nt you????????
> >
> > Most of us are looking at the TeleVision from time to time.
And
> > most of
> > us can recieve the signals in a good quality either via
cable,
> > parabol
> > or an antenna on the roof. But if we instead plug a knitting
> > needle in
> > the TV it will surely perform a very bad image. But
TeleVision as a
> > media and a communication tool is very good. We can discuss
the
> > content,
> > but TV is not bad because of the bad content.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
> >
> >
> > ColorCode is a very very good product under the right
circumstances:
> >
> > ¤ Original filters in the glasses
> > ¤ Original ColorCode conversion
> > ¤ A good screen
> > ¤ Dim light (if possible)
> >
> > Some people in the group are making there own "ColorCde"
images in
> > different ways. Don't evaluate them as ColorCode images,
because they
> > are not ColorCode images. They are that members own way to
create an
> > image like ColorCode, and you can't blame ColorCode or give
them the
> > benefit for the result.
> >
> >
> > _A little metafor from the frensh artist René Magritte in 2-
D_
> >
> > Ceci n'est pas une pipe
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > My point is: things ain't necessarly bad because some people
can't
> > get the full experience of them.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
> >
> > The other day I posted this mail to the group:
> > http://abdownload.free.fr/Anaglyphs/13/13715_Body.html
> > Please read it
> > and have it in your mind, next time you are viewing
ColorCode images.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
> >
> > It is not my mission to crucify some people in the group. I
only want
> > them to stop saying that ColorCode is bad and join the
discussions
> > with
> > constructive and relevant statements.
> >
> >
> > Thank You for taking time to read this
> > Best regards
> >
> > Claus Krarup
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
-------
> > *Yahoo! Messenger with Voice*
> >
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_it/taglines/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.c
om>:
> > chiama da PC a telefono a tariffe esclusive
> >
> > Attention new and "digest" subscribers:
http://abdownload.free.fr/ is
> > the Anaglyphs archive link that includes the photos as well.
> >
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > Photography school
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
t=ms&k=Photography+school&w1=Photography+school&w2=Stock+photography&
w3=Photographs&w4=Published&c=4&s=79&.sig=fMLaAD9vDQL7MSInM-C0rQ>
> > Stock photography
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
t=ms&k=Stock+photography&w1=Photography+school&w2=Stock+photography&w
3=Photographs&w4=Published&c=4&s=79&.sig=WVUUgoz3ABEMVpqzWH4mCg>
> > Photographs
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
t=ms&k=Photographs&w1=Photography+school&w2=Stock+photography&w3=Phot
ographs&w4=Published&c=4&s=79&.sig=Y2JGZ5DGsPGwnmmyRBgY6A>
> >
> > Published
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
t=ms&k=Published&w1=Photography+school&w2=Stock+photography&w3=Photog
raphs&w4=Published&c=4&s=79&.sig=gf0Q4FUFUL8k1Fb2fWrz0A>
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
-------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > * Visit your group "anaglyphs
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/anaglyphs>" on the web.
> >
> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > anaglyphs-unsubscribe.yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:anaglyphs-unsubscribe.yahoogroups.com?
subject=Unsubscribe>
> >
> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of
> > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
-------
> >
>
.
| Photography school | Stock photography | Photographs |
| Published |