(In reply to)
Messages on Anaglyphs group
Post on Anaglyphs group
Viewed
It seems the posts on this subject have gone off the track a bit!
Claus is correct I think - if you make an amber/blue anaglyph in Photoshop you really
should not give it a trade mark name such as ColorCode. It is only ColorCode if it is made
in the prescribed software, which seems to do a lot more than we understood, what with
analysing pixel colours and transforming them to another colour in order to match the
ColorCode filters.
Previously I understood the potential trade-mark sensitivity and wanted to code amber/
blue anaglyphs "AB" for the benefit of those who hate them. But Wotjek pointed out that
"AB" already meant "Anabuilder". So we settled on "CC" because they require ColorCode
goggles to biew them. However, most of the posted "CC" anaglyphs are in fact made in
Photoshop.
"RC" means red/cyan (and so far the church has not complained).
So my question to Claus is: can we continue with the "CC" code for Photoshop-created
amber/blue anaglyphs?
If not. what code should we use?
Since the darkened left eye filter is really ochre or brown rather than amber, should the
code be "OB"? or "BB"?
"CC" could be retained for true ColorCode anaglyphs, but that might be too pernickety?
After all the code is just there to help folks who do not want to see amber/blue anaglyphs.
They use it to redirect e-mail with CC in the subject line to the trash file. Personally, I
would hope we could stay with "CC"
John Wattie
----------------------------------
--- In anaglyphs.yahoogroups.com, Dariush Radpour <osservo2000....> wrote:
>
> Something goes terribly wrong here.....!
>
> Dariush
>
> Claus Krarup <ck....> ha scritto:
> Dear Wojtek
>
> You make me crying. Why are we danish people always misunderstoooohhhd??
>
> What I mean is that ColorCode is a trademark like CocaCola. You must only use trade
marks with the original product. No one will take the right from You to make your own
conversions, and no one will take You to the court for doing it. Just don't put a trademark
name on it.
>
> I wrote:
>
> They are that members own way to create an image like ColorCode, and you can't blame
ColorCode or give them the benefit for the result. I think it indicates that some of you has
made very good conversions. Yesterday Louis wrote: "Even Claus Krarup seems to think
that my CC versions looks better than the official versions"
>
> Please forget all about "get appreciation from you" - "otherwise it is not acceptable" and
"a legal action
> against me and the manufacturer" it is absolutely not what I mean. And I will give
comments to your images if I have some relevant to say.
>
> I hope we don't misunderstand each other after this.
>
> Yes, it is a problem for Mac owners. You can solve this problem if You have some PC-
emulating software on your Mac. It will work.
>
> Untill ColoCode makes software for Mac, You and others are very welcome to post
images to me. Then I will convert them, and of course: FREEEEEEEE!!!
>
> Best regards
>
> Claus
>
>
>
> Wojtek Rychlik skrev: Claus,
> I see you as the highest authority in ColorCode. I think that this
> anaglyphic technique as a very usefull tool as sometimes CC format is
> superior to R/C, in my opinion. I'm using Mac and your software won't
> help me any in making CC format popular.
> So I was even further depressed that you dismissed all other methods
> of creating CC images but the genuine CC software. This simply means
> that whoever wants to post a CC image and get appreciation from you
> must use the CC software, otherwise it is not acceptable, no matter
> how good the image looks. Don't you realize that you are effectively
> repelling all potential users (or customers) from even trying the
> CC style?
>
> So, if I make for example a yellow/blue anaglyph the best thing that
> may happen to me is your silence and the worst is a legal action
> against me and the manufacturer of the infamous software that allowed
> me to make such a yellow/blue anaglyph on my Macintosh? Do you think
> that now I'm encouraged to consider ColorCode now?
>
> Cheers,
> Wojtek
>
>
> On Mar 17, 2006, at 4:07 AM, Claus Krarup wrote:
>
> > Some people in the group are making there own "ColorCde" images in
> > different ways. Don't evaluate them as ColorCode images, because
> > they are not ColorCode images. They are that members own way to
> > create an image like ColorCode, and you can't blame ColorCode or
> > give them the benefit for the result.
>
> .
>
> Attention new and "digest" subscribers: http://abdownload.free.fr/ is the Anaglyphs
archive link that includes the photos as well.
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Photography school Stock photography Photographs Published
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "anaglyphs" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> anaglyphs-unsubscribe.yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3
>
.
| Photography school | Stock photography | Photographs |
| Published |