Previous 13985 Next
(In reply to)
Messages on Anaglyphs group
Post on Anaglyphs group
Viewed [?00?] time(s)


Subject : Re: [Anaglyphs] -->-->--> Disappointed and agitated <--<--<--
From : Claus Krarup
To : anaglyphs.yahoogroups.com
Date : Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:45:36 +0100


Thank's Marshall
I hope so, because this i a walk in ring. I am glad You took the initiative. It is better than if I have done it.

Best regards
Claus

Marshall Rubin skrev:
Can we leave the sales talk behind and just look and have friendly critiques of the PICTURES, rather than the software?
 
Marshall
----- Original Message -----
From: Claus Krarup
To: Anaglyphs
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 6:07 AM
Subject: [Anaglyphs] -->-->--> Disappointed and agitated <--<--<--

Dear members of the group please read this and try to understand what I mean even though my english is bad.


I am disappointed and agitated because some members of this group apparently are crusaders against ColorCode. They have problems with viewing ColorCode images, and that is OK. But it is not OK to insinuate, that ColorCode is a bad prouct, and it is not OK to talk bad about it, just because one have problems with viewing it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let us take a look at the world outside the group:

My daughter can't hear stereomusic because she is born with a damage on the ears. She never says that stereomusic is bad. She don't talk about it because she don't have the possibilities to evaluate it.

My brother-in-law can only see with his right eye. He is not talking bad about 3-D. But he is sorry about it and wish he was able to see 3-D, like my doughter is sorry about she can't listen to stereomusic.

I think most people will be agitated at theese two people if they say stereomusic and stereoimages are bad. Woud'nt you????????

Most of us are looking at the TeleVision from time to time. And most of us can recieve the signals in a good quality either via cable, parabol or an antenna on the roof. But if we instead plug a knitting needle in the TV it will surely perform a very bad image. But TeleVision as a media and a communication tool is very good. We can discuss the content, but TV is not bad because of the bad content.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ColorCode is a very very good product under the right circumstances:

¤ Original filters in the glasses
¤ Original ColorCode conversion
¤ A good screen
¤ Dim light (if possible)

Some people in the group are making there own "ColorCde" images in different ways. Don't evaluate them as ColorCode images, because they are not ColorCode images. They are that members own way to create an image like ColorCode, and you can't blame ColorCode or give them the benefit for the result.


A little metafor from the frensh artist René Magritte in 2-D

Ceci n'est pas une pipe



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My point is: things ain't necessarly bad because some people can't get the full experience of them.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The other day I posted this mail to the group: http://abdownload.free.fr/Anaglyphs/13/13715_Body.html   Please read it and have it in your mind, next time you are viewing ColorCode images.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is not my mission to crucify some people in the group. I only want them to stop saying that ColorCode is bad and join the discussions with constructive and relevant statements.


Thank You for taking time to read this
Best regards

Claus Krarup




Attention new and "digest" subscribers: http://abdownload.free.fr/ is the Anaglyphs archive link that includes the photos as well.



SPONSORED LINKS
Photography school Stock photography Photographs
Published


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS