Dear Guglielmo my friend, maybe, yes maybe I say, me and Shahrokh and some other members are not so clear about Window Violataion, (but we know very well what it means..) but your language sounds very hard and offensive...!! Please moderate the tone and change some words as Mad, out of range,completly false and so on..! I think that we sufficently explained which kind of Window Violation disturbs the sight and which one ( pop-up through the window ) not. Your contribution as a 3D master is really apprecitated but that dosn't mean we are carrying some new commers on the wrong road. I really didn't understand.. your reaction and your language this time!!! Ciao, Dariush --- Ven 2/1/09, Guglielmo Menegatti <kems(-at-)magia.it> ha scritto: Da: Guglielmo Menegatti <kems(-at-)magia.it> Oggetto: [Anaglyphs] Window violation A: "anaglyphs" <anaglyphs(-at-)yahoogroups.com> Data: Venerd́ 2 gennaio 2009, 13:41 Please, please, stop with the definitions that confuse all people. Dariush, Shahrokh and others... your explications and tutorials are out of range, if you want the people understand and increase their knowledge of the stereo phenomenon please describe your theory and not show mad examples or feelings or definition that is completely false. I hope Betty that is a prof of applied arts help me to write in a correct english the true theory of the stereo windows and the violations problems. For now and in a summary please remember that the window violation create a visualisation disturb only in a determinate cases and not in all images. Ciao Guglielmo

•  12
  New Members