Dear Dariush, you made your point quite clear.
?no, there is not a matter of taste, it's a objective fact? ? I know from quite a number of your posts that you tend to think that your opinion is an objective guideline while others' views are just erroneous conjectures. However, let me phrase it in a way that can be reversed: I am convinced that your taste is as good as mine.
?his arm stayed flat? ? I never intended to make the arm jut out in such an exaggerated way. Before I start a conversion I do some research. The camera men were standing on an adjustable wooden rig, with the platform 1 metre above ground level, 3 metres from the dictator's car. The building in the background was at a distance of 50 metres across the street. I took these relations as the basis for my conversion. When possible I try to be true to scale and to the laws of optics. If you obey different laws and preferences it is fine with me. Again, I am convinced that your method is as justified as mine.
As a matter of course I concede that your revamped version is quite impressive. But at some price. You left parts of the far-away crowd sticking to the shoulder. I have outlined these parts in the attachment, otherwise you won't believe me.
Please continue teaching me about anaglyph conversions. I am grateful and always eager to learn.
Yours, J.V.
(567K)